Yes.

Ulfric Stormcloak is a Nord from Skyrim.

He fought him in the 'old ways'. - Skyrim's Rule, A Redguard explains Skyrim's political system Ulfric had spoken of independence at Torygg's moot. The only thing that would be bad for the Dominion is if the war came to an abrupt halt. Because the Reachmen fight for the exact same reasons Ulfric fights, but double standards be double standards. To Ulfric, there was only one alternative left.

Ulfric murder of the High King? The largely Nordic population of Windhelm supports both Ulfric and his rebellion, as Ulfric is … The empire tries to execute you. Since 4E 176 Ulfric has been leading a Civil War against the Third Empire, which escalated after he killed High King Torygg in 4E 201.

In fact Torygg had been known to give speeches of Empire this and Empire that. I didn't see this in the game anywhere, so if I'm wrong I would like the opportunity to be corrected.I believe the woman who runs "Bits and Pieces" will say something to the …

That's wrong.

Clearly, a prolonged civil war in Skyrim would do nothing but weaken the Empire (at least in Skyrim) and, or course, weaken Skyrim itself if the Nords under Ulfric eventually prevailed. Either outcome is good for the Dominion.

Menu Home

As the Jarl of Windhelm, Ulfric has both positive and negative aspects. In so doing, he killed someone who was a fan of Ulfric.

But that old way is not found in the 3rd Edition of the Guide.

Page 5 of 58 - Why Ulfric was right to kill the High King - posted in Skyrim Spoilers: Please cite for me the part where you found evidence of Toryg's beliefs and/or political agenda outside of Ulfric (who is bias) calling him a puppet. Whether you're a sworn Imperial supporter or a cunning warrior of the Stormcloaks, these 10 Stormcloak memes will no doubt have you giggling to pieces by the end of it.

Murder. Aside from gameplay and story, the game designers made an excellent lesser-of-two-evils scenario.

There are pros and cons to each side, of course, but today we'll focus our attention on the Stormcloaks, a band of highly nationalistic Nords that fight for the independence of Skyrim under Ulfric Stromcloak's command.

Although Ulfric has many just reasons, and we don't know if Skyrim does or doesn't have the power to stand against the Thalmor alone (untill TES 6 at least), the one thing that always keeps me away from the Stormcloak side is the Reach story.

The High King had shown nothing to indicate he respected, or agreed with Ulfric Stormcloak. For The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim on the Xbox 360, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "To everyone saying Ulfric using the Thu'um against Torygg was wrong...". Its an appeal to old Nordic traditions that were no longer in use in Imperial Skyrim, to nordic customs, not Imperial/Skyrim law. He is the son of Hoag Stormcloak, the previous Jarl of Eastmarch. Either by one side or the other winning in a series of stunning victories aided by a heroic (whisper it) … How many Jarls and Kings will change hands during Ulfrics … Ulfric's cause is a good one but misguided, how would Skyrim rule itself if one man can kill another and claim their title, the strong and arrogant will rule over the smart and weak, if a Bandit chief can simply walk into a Jarl's longhouse and challenge them to a duel in the old way they'd have to accept and the title will be passed onto the victor.